Sunday Review: 1964 by James Farner


by James Farner

Rating: 2 stars

A good effort that fell short

Spoiler Alert: If you haven’t read the book, this review contains pieces of the story that may hamper your enjoyment if you decide to read it.

I had high hopes for the story for two reasons: 1) For some odd reason titles that use only a year intrigue me; 2) It was set in a small community in the UK. However, the lack of polish and editing of the story slowed the pace and, in some instances, confused me. Many sentences were unnecessarily wordy.

1964 (Made in Yorkshire Book 1) (Made In Yorkshire Saga) by [Farner, James]There were some scenes that were unnecessary for telling the story, and this too slowed down the pace. It was a struggle to complete the novel, but in my goal to write more reviews, I ploughed onward.

I wanted to like the main character, Richard, more, but I felt his parents were favouring him over his older brother Peter for no real reason. Richard was inquisitive and at times brave, but he was part of the reason his brother was treated poorly by their parents.

Speaking of the parents, there was no reason given for their lack of respect they had for Peter. Peter worked hard and deserved more than he got. I understand the use of the strap in 1964, but it seemed Peter was punished for little reason, whereas Richard was given a free ride. The home environment for Peter amounted to child abuse. Richard hinted to the fact that his father might be working Peter hard, so he could take over the farm, but that was not the reason. So why was Peter treated like a slave? I was not shocked he ran off. He had hinted as much earlier in the story.

While Peter was working hard, Richard was not even asked to help. At the very beginning of the story, Richard had done a little work in the field, but then he was off to play or write or wander. Richard, a boy of eleven, would have had chores on a farm that would have kept him busy for at least half the day.

Knowing all this made the story hard to believe. If the parents were so good and righteous, why did they treat their oldest son like dirt? I’m left with questions like: Why was Richard favoured? Where did Peter go? Did he send Richard’s story into the magazine? And if so, it proves Peter was more worthy than his parents’ gave him credit. His purchase of the pen for his little brother was a kind act that went unrewarded.

The cover was appealing, and that was a large part of the reason I downloaded the book.

This book can be purchased at, and ChaptersIndigo.

About Sunday Review

One resolution I made this year was to catch up on my reading. I have almost 250 books on my to-read shelf, so I have a lot of catching up to do.

Reviews are the life blood books, so I will post my reviews on,, Goodreads, my Facebook page, Chapters Indigo, Smashwords and here. I may not have a review every Sunday, but I hope to have at least two a month.

Please, don’t ask me to review your book. It will take me three years to get through the books I already have and those that trickle in from one source or another, along with impulse buys.

5,000 Word Evaluation

Are you looking for an unbiased, honest evaluation of your writing? Check out First 5,000 Words Evaluation. [Note: I will be taking the month of July off. My schedule for August is full. I have two openings for 5,000 Words Evaluations in September.]

4 thoughts on “Sunday Review: 1964 by James Farner

    • I was considering 2.5 stars, but the ending felt rushed and incomplete. It started with potential, but the lack of editing spoiled the reading experience. If I can’t give an honest review, then I won’t give a review at all.

      I think what bothered me the most about the story was the lack of reason why Peter was treated as he was. A hint, some morsel of reasoning would have given me something to go on, but there was none. This made me think that Richard was a spoilt brat, and he didn’t deserve what he got. If there was a ‘bad guy’ in the story, it was Richard.

      Liked by 1 person

      • I fully understand what you’re saying. And I’ve certainly read my share of 2 star books,. but somehow I never mustered the guts to review low rated books. I guess it’s my empathy that keeps me from doing so. I know how distraught I’d feel if I received it. I simply don’t review. So, yes, I applaud you. 🙂


        • I guess the reason I feel comfortable with giving a two-star review is that I gave clear reasons why. If the author bothers to read it, perhaps they will step back and think about how this applies to their story. They can ignore it or they might think, “I’m going to remember this and do better in my next story.”

          That’s what I’d do. If a review points out a weakness in my writing, I’m going to take that information and learn from it. It’s the only way I can become a better writer.

          I would never give a review that simply said I didn’t like it. That doesn’t tell the author anything.

          Honest reviews should–in theory–help writers to improve their craft. If they didn’t want an honest review, they could just get a family member to tell them how great it was.

          Liked by 1 person

Please Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.